Closed hadisfr closed 6 years ago
Also, it fails to render first name of author in misc
types; e.g.:
@misc{code:safari18:pybiclique,
title = {pybiclique},
author = {Hadi Safari},
howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/hadisfr/pybiclique}}
}
The second one is the expected behaviour, i.e., the default format is:
{author_short} {year} - {title_short} ({keyword})
Where {author_short}
is either 1) the last name of a single-author piece, 2) the last names of both authors conjoined with an &
for a two-author piece, or 3) the last name of the first author with "et. al." for a multiple author piece. You can change the format in your sublime settings to something like:
{author} {year} - {title_short} ({keyword})
which will give you everything in the name field, though this may cause the year, title and keyword to not be displayed.
The first problem can be fixed by changing the bibliography
setting to "new"
. The difference between the two bibliographies is that the "new" bibliography reader uses a proper parser, so it handles cases like this, but as a result it can perform worse that the "traditional" bibliography reader that uses regexes, but has some pretty fixed formatting requirements and doesn't support multiline values.
Note that you may have to completely delete the LaTeXTools cache to see the results.
Thank you. For the second one, I expected first name. For the second one, I didn't know limitations of traditional parser. It may be a good idea to add what you have said in https://github.com/SublimeText/LaTeXTools/issues/1361#issuecomment-415465560 to docs. 🤔
Besides, when do you think version 4 will be out? There are many pending pull requests.
\cite
complition shows????
for multi-line bibitemauthor
attribute in bib file.