Support new module system keywords

[willrowe]

Support for the new keywords like @use and @forward introduced along with the new module system would be great.

[braver]

Thanks for the heads up!

[dvlden]

Hello, any progress on this?

[braver]

I must say I have not looked into it yet.

[dvlden]

How many coffees would be needed to get this done? (and what is the price of the coffee in your area) ☕

[braver]

LOL. I haven’t gone out for coffee in ages thanks to 🦠. I tend to use beans from a local roaster, they charge about €7 a bag (1/4 kilo). So a couple of cents per cup 😄

What I really need is some days off so I can get around to some chores that are piling up. This thing here probably is quite easy so I bet this or next week depending on the weather.

[dvlden]

Ah, right... I see. Appears that your "fund" is a PayPal Pool, which I have no clues about, but it's not available in Serbia. Is there a link where I can throw some cash directly to your PayPal, just so that you don't forget about this little issue...

Waiting for your reply.

[braver]

I think maybe you can use this link to make a payment, but it probably requires a PayPal account: https://www.paypal.me/koenlageveen

Beyond that is too much trouble probably. I appreciate the gesture and will definitely get around to this very soon.

[dvlden]

Thanks for the link. Just sent some money to support this feature development. I badly need it, as the current syntax highlighting is not good at all.

Highly appreciate your work!

[braver]

Ok, so I made a start. I need to run through the syntax specs for more details and maybe polish up some scope names, but it should already be better. If you want you can already try the laster master of this package, I'd love to get some feedback as I've yet to switch my projects over to the module system (I want to badly though! it looks really useful).

[dvlden]

@braver Why did you send me $2? 🤔 I just tried and it appears to be working only for @use, including @use '...' with ().

Providing some screenshots as samples, it doesn't work in most cases.

[braver]

Why did you send me $2?

I don't believe I did. I did notice PayPal held back some for service costs or something, maybe they refunded you something?

Thanks a lot for those test cases, that clears up some of the questions I had. I'll go through the docs some more and iron out those kinks.

[braver]

Alright, pushed some tweaks, try that on for a size!

[dvlden]

Ah, my bad. It was $2 donation from someone, I thought I saw your name. Wow, it appears that everything is working great right now.

I'll try to get some more examples and make it fail somewhere. Thanks a lot for working on this!

[braver]

Yeah, I expect it to be pretty solid already. None of the existing tests fail and I think I covered all the cases I could find the documentation. If you find anything, let me know. For now, I'll consider this solved and will close this issue and build a release.

Thanks for the help!

[willrowe]

Looks good to me, seems to be handling some pretty complex files perfectly. I will submit an issue if I find any bugs after working with it for a bit.

Thank you so much for the updates @braver!

[braver]

@dvlden @willrowe maybe you guys know this from practice: is it possible to combine as with with()?

[dvlden]

@braver nice find... I've been debugging a lot and couldn't find any issues, but this seems to be one. Yeh, it is allowed to do this.

This will not work in Sass Lang, as it is invalid syntax/order.

@use 'differs' with (
  $color: #32d,
) as dfr;

This is the correct order, but syntax highlighting is not working properly.

@use 'differs' as dfr with (
  $color: #32d,
);

[willrowe]

I found the same thing, the as must be before the with.

[braver]

Thanks guys, 2.4.1 out now

[dvlden]

@braver Oops, seems that this now breaks things, instead. I removed the master directory and installed it via package control. Looks like @use '' as xx with (); doesn't end where supposed.

This is what it turns into, everything white, below this syntax.

EDIT 1: If I inline it as @use 'differs' as dfr with ($color: #32d); it fixes syntax highlighting below, but still the with is not a different color. Shouldn't it be the same as without as/with?

[braver]

It can take over an hour for package control to pick up the latest release. So probably you were switched back to before this fix. I'd suggest sticking to master for today.

[dvlden]

Yup seems to be the case. Switched back to your master branch. Thanks again for those improvements!