search

SuffolkLITLab / docassemble-MA209AProtectiveOrder

Interview for a Massachusetts 209A Protection from Abuse Order, created using the Assembly Line project
https://courtformsonline.org
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Users under 18 need consistency throughout interivew - Bentley UX Row 43 #21

Open CaroRob opened 4 years ago

CaroRob commented 4 years ago

The system allows users who are under 18 to fill out the report if accompanied by a parent, yet the question on this page is written in a format that is directed to a person who is over 18. A child filling out the form may answer "no" to this questions, yet omit that their parent would answer "yes" to such questions. It would be helpful to revise the language or provide instruction to have the child completing the form direct questions to their parent to provide accurate answers. Copy of Expert Review (209A and Aff. of Indigency)

nonprofittechy commented 4 years ago

It's unfortunate that we don't know what screen this is referring to. Hopefully Caroline can determine from context?

CaroRob commented 4 years ago

I put this in quickly - I agree, that it is confusing to figure out which question they are talking about. My plan has been to clean up language about children under 18 - so if plaintiff is under 18, they only get asked if they have any children, and if they are caring for any children, in the latter question it is hard to imagine an under 18 caring for an over 18 year old child - unless perhaps older child has a disability .... still that is such a far out case.... I think we should just change language on asking about children pages.

CaroRob commented 3 years ago

related to issue SuffolkLITLab/docassemble-MA209AProtectiveOrder#15 I thought this was definite to do, now not going to push for MVP @kateleebarry @nonprofittechy