After taking a look at both the old tax lien document and our current project, I noticed that the old one gets straight to the point regarding the user listing all parties. First it asks for the plaintiffs, then the defendants. For our new project, though; we ask who is filling the form out, we ask a few more questions unrelated to party information, then ask if there is a plaintiff/petitioner. It seems like the flow of the earlier document is smoother, addressing party issues then moving on to other issues, while ours seems to commingle them. If we are working toward a document that a middle-schooler could understand and operate, could our current flow be more confusing than the old one? Should we re-approach with an organization similar to that of the old one?
After taking a look at both the old tax lien document and our current project, I noticed that the old one gets straight to the point regarding the user listing all parties. First it asks for the plaintiffs, then the defendants. For our new project, though; we ask who is filling the form out, we ask a few more questions unrelated to party information, then ask if there is a plaintiff/petitioner. It seems like the flow of the earlier document is smoother, addressing party issues then moving on to other issues, while ours seems to commingle them. If we are working toward a document that a middle-schooler could understand and operate, could our current flow be more confusing than the old one? Should we re-approach with an organization similar to that of the old one?