Closed KarlaRFuentes closed 4 months ago
ANSWER FROM CT LEADERSHIP:
Usually, people type the number in and it verifies. Joe says to allow people to use it, even if it means skipping.
Maybe we can do the shaded format for the numbers to guide users, an example was given where a page has a social security # format so the users knew which numbers to look for on their documents and what order the number would be in. Consider sticking with "docket number" instead of "case number."
https://www.mass.gov/info-details/how-to-search-court-dockets#video-introduction:-how-to-search-court-dockets- ^ For if you don’t know how to access your number. Maybe we can link this.
Decision-makers would like us to add a note telling the user they can find the docket number on the citation or complaint. The note with the example of the number should also have a disclaimer that it is case and number sensitive.
Related question: it looks like the court uses "docket number" and "case number" interchangeably. We should include a note about that on the page where we ask for it.
Docket number page has been reworked in the following ways:
The current Guide and File asks for the docket number in the first question and makes it required to give one but the user can put anything and it will allow them to continue. In our interview we allow the user to click an option that says they don't have it and are allowed to continue. If the user does not have their docket number should we just kick them out of the interview?