SuperNETorg / EasyDEX-GUI

Please use http://github.com/komodoplatform/easydex-gui
GNU General Public License v3.0
15 stars 13 forks source link

2nd Komodo address beside main one #45

Closed ghost closed 7 years ago

ghost commented 7 years ago

OS: Ubuntu Mode: Basilisk

I have a second Komodo receiving address beside the main one. I didn't generate it. I didn't notice it was there until I made my first transaction.

satindergrewal commented 7 years ago

need exact steps to replicate

ghost commented 7 years ago

I didn't anything special, this was v 0.1.4 on a fresh Ubuntu install. I had the same issue in a previous install of the same version, do you remember? Kashifali tried to help me but the second address disappeared after a while. I loaded Komodo in Basilisk mode and entered my main account, I created a transaction that was sent successfully. Only at that point I had a look at the receiving tab and I found a second receiving address, I can't say at which point it was created. Certainly it wasn't there when I first installed it a few days ago, because I made fresh.

rtousan commented 7 years ago

Ver.0.1.6.1e OS: Ubuntu,Windows Mode: Basilisk

I was also frequently reproduced, If only the main address is displayed, Komodo's transmission will succeed, Transmission will not succeed whenever two addresses are visible. sent

Clear cache and fetch Wallet Data rarely happens to be one address by doing it. It seems that you need more than one Clear cache and fetch wallet data.

satindergrewal commented 7 years ago

It's a known problem with current versions, and the fix can be expected in future releases sometime.

Transmission will not succeed whenever two addresses are visible.

Having a second address showing in the Basilisk Wallet should never be an issue sending transactions via Basilisk Mode wallet. The issue must be something else, that you are linking with this reported problem.

The second address is only visible on first-time wallet logged in to. Like the passphrase was used first time to login to wallet. To replicate it

Simple fix/workaround for now: