WTF is wrong with you people? THE NEW MUPEN64 IS AS FAKE AS JOAN RIVER'S FACE

[GoogleCodeExporter]

When I saw the announcement that Mupen64 Plus was released, at first I was 
excited, because at long last, Mupen64 was released. I thought it was no longer 
a part of Linux OS discrimination; how wrong I was. When I downloaded the 
compiled binary off of this google code website, and extracted the file, it 
contained Project64 1.7 beta, WHICH REQUIRES A DONATION OF AT LEAST 20 DOLLARS 
(OR EQUIVALENT) BEFORE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD AND USE! Did the PJ64 team give you 
permission to steal their work and brand it as one of you own? Yeah, I didn't 
think so either. Unless you there's some other explanation, I'm accusing you of 
plagiarism. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUhbGf29nDU  this proves my point. 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by nintendonerd1889@gmail.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:24

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This person tries to defame mupen64plus. See #396 for more information about 
his "file type association" trick which he used to make this video without any 
editing (at least he seems not to lie about that part).

Original comment by sven@narfation.org on 23 Nov 2010 at 11:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I made that video, look at this picture: 
http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh137/Nintendo1889/thisisnotmupen64.jpg 
Isn't Mupen64 supposed to have a purple icon and not green?  Download the file 
and extract it, then show me a picture.  I am NOT making this up! Just download 
the bloody zip file. 

Original comment by nintendonerd1889@gmail.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 11:26

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What the hel** is wrong with you people? Look at this new video, CAREFULLY. You 
can CLEARLY SEE THAT I DID NOT EDIT 
IT.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xdKawl4FSM I don't have ANY EDITING SOFTWARE

Original comment by nintendonerd1889@gmail.com on 23 Nov 2010 at 11:44

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Learn to read. Don't open the rom file with pj64 (the program you associated 
with the file ending v64), but open mupen64plus-ui-console - the only program 
which is inside the zip

Original comment by sven@narfation.org on 23 Nov 2010 at 11:49

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As you wanted a picture... here is it. Hope that you see the big red lines 
which clearly explains what you have done to make that video... which only 
shows that you have a associated the file ending v64 with pj64 and opened a rom 
file instead of the executable

Original comment by sven@narfation.org on 24 Nov 2010 at 12:01

Attachments:

• file_endings.png

[GoogleCodeExporter]

And look at your video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xdKawl4FSM at second 45. 
You can clearly see that this is no executable file, but a .v64 file you open 
with project64

Original comment by sven@narfation.org on 24 Nov 2010 at 12:28

Attachments:

• opens_with.png

[GoogleCodeExporter]

All the "mupen64plus-ui-console" does is flash a screen for a split second; it 
doesn't open

Original comment by nintendonerd1889@gmail.com on 24 Nov 2010 at 1:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Maybe you didn't notice, but it is called -ui-console because it is a console 
program and not an graphical user interface. So you should open a commandline 
and start it. Then you will see all its options. Usually you just use it like 
that: `mupen64plus-ui-console ROMNAME`. ROMNAME is the complete path including 
file ending to a uncompressed n64 rom

Original comment by sven@narfation.org on 24 Nov 2010 at 8:15

[GoogleCodeExporter]

mupen64plus-ui-console.exe on Windows. Drag a rom like mupen64plus.v64 and drop 
it at mupen64plus-ui-console.exe should also work on windows - but I am not 
sure about that.

So, maybe now it is the right time to apologize for what you have done...

And if anyone wants to have the original videos he published and now removed 
then I can still provide them for research purposes.

Original comment by sven@narfation.org on 24 Nov 2010 at 8:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I close the ticket.

Thanks for your work muellhierrein, I belive you.

Mupen64Plus is not a fake, some people work on it and it's open source. :)

Original comment by dorian.f...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2010 at 8:19

• Changed state: Invalid