Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
This was intended to be an enhancement rather than defect
Original comment by bugg...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2011 at 5:14
Please explain where you want to access the system properties within your tests
and why --variable is not sufficient for you.
Original comment by dietrich...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2011 at 5:16
--variable approach is great for controlling user input, such as application
information (for example, directing the robot test suite to a particular
application url as a test target).
However, system properties seem to be conceptually more appropriate for
application's global properties (such as tomcat, activeMq locations, etc) and
can be invoked from java system property across multiple robot testsuite
without having to explicitly pass it to all consumers.
Not having systemProperties is definitely not a show-stopper for us against
using maven robot plugin, but it is a convenience adopted across the team
already.
Original comment by bugg...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2011 at 11:59
let's see if we can have this in by version 1.2
Original comment by mrmall...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2011 at 10:09
as a workaround I'm using properties:set-system-properties
Original comment by TuomasKi...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2011 at 12:43
surefire was mentioned as example but it could be used to run robotframework
altogether which would utilize all of the current and forthcoming maven
features such as this system property issue. I think this project could
function as surefire/failsafe provider as well.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/providers.html
Original comment by TuomasKi...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2011 at 1:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bugg...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2011 at 5:13