Open VladimirAlexiev opened 1 month ago
I am happy to add rdfs:isDefinedBy
but should we also use rdfs:domain?
rdfs:domain
and it means "this prop is defined on that class"rdfs:isDefinedBy
means "this term (class or prop) is defined by that ontology"
This is not an easy task, since some terms are defined by 20 ontologies.
It only makes sense to do this after "ontology modularization" (now described at https://github.com/Sveino/Inst4CIM-KG/issues/5#issuecomment-2466777778)rdfs:isDefinedBy
should then be equivalent to cims:belongsToCategory
I agree that this only make sense to do after "ontology modularization".
Each ontology term should have
rdfs:isDefinedBy
to the ontology node. This allows sem.web crawlers that stumble upon a CIM term, to discover the whole CIM ontology.https://github.com/Sveino/Inst4CIM-KG/issues/5 is a soft blocker for this:
Note: https://github.com/Sveino/Inst4CIM-KG/blob/develop/archive/PROF-AP-CIM_v15July2020/PROF-CIM-Vocabulary.rdf has some related discussion: