wrong `cims:AssociationUsed` or lacking `owl:inverseOf`

[VladimirAlexiev]

Let's do some checks related to #113

• [ ] 3 prop pairs lack proper cims:AssociationUsed:

  PREFIX cims: <http://iec.ch/TC57/1999/rdf-schema-extensions-19990926#>
  PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
  select * {
  ?x owl:inverseOf ?y. 
  filter (!(
      exists {?x cims:AssociationUsed "Yes". ?y cims:AssociationUsed "No"}
   || exists {?y cims:AssociationUsed "Yes". ?x cims:AssociationUsed "No"}
  ))
  }

  	x	y
  1	dcat: Dataset.publisher	dcat: Dataset.Resource11
  2	nc: PowerBidSchedule.ScheduleResource	nc: ScheduleResource.PowerBidSchedule
  3	nc: ScheduleResource.PowerBidSchedule	nc: PowerBidSchedule.ScheduleResource

Of them:

• [ ] one pair lacks inverseOf in the opposite direction: dcat:Dataset.publisher - dcat:Dataset.Resource11
• [ ] one pair has cims:AssociationUsed "No" in both directions nc:PowerBidSchedule.ScheduleResource - nc:ScheduleResource.PowerBidSchedule

[griddigit-ci]

problem 1 was fixed in DatasetMetadata-AP-Voc-RDFS2020_v2-4-1.rdf the namespace was wrong

problem 2 - Svein, we need to discuss if we need this association. It is hidden in SIS profile. It does not show on diagrams and this is why we missed to put the direction. We will need a patch of SIS profile to resolve this. Options are 1) delete the association - which will leas to v3 of the SIS 2) add to diagram, add direction, export the spec, the RDFS, the SHACL and do patch version for all of them

[Sveino]

Problem 2 : This is a bug and the association should be deleted.