Please examine it for ontological errors.
Here is a count by prop name. I've marked <<< differences that are errors, and ??? that for me are questionable .
perl -pe 's{.*?\.(.*?),.*}{$1}' props-same-name-different-range.csv |sort|uniq -c|sort -rn
253 kind
79 value
45 mode
30 Terminal
23 RemedialAction
21 kd ??? boolean vs float
17 uelin ??? boolean vs cim:ExcIEEEST1AUELselectorKind, cim:ExcST7BUELselectorKind, cim:ExcST7BUELselectorKind...
14 k1 ??? boolean vs float
9 pPccControl
9 operatingMode
8 oelin
8 m
7 type
7 normalValue
7 Region
6 exclim
5 direction
5 Measurements
5 DCTerminals
3 step
2 absoluteValue ??? imho nc:GateInputPin.absoluteValue (xsd:boolean) should be called `useAbsoluteValue`
1 zPosition <<< float is right, string is wrong
1 yPosition <<<
1 xPosition <<<
1 version <<< md:Model.version xsd:integer is wrong, dcat:Resource.version xsd:string is right
1 startTime
1 section
1 publisher
1 minimumOffTime ??? cim:GeneratingUnit.minimumOffTime xsd:float vs nc:PowerBidSchedule.minimumOffTime,xsd:duration
1 governorControl
1 fbf ??? cim:ExcREXSFeedbackSignalKind vs xsd:boolean
1 endTime
1 ProposingEntity
1 LoadGroup
1 Limits
1 LimitSets
1 LimitSet
1 EnergyConsumers
1 EnergyConnectionSchedule
1 DCConductingEquipment
1 CsConverterSchedule
(Split from https://github.com/Sveino/Inst4CIM-KG/issues/100)
rdf-improved/props-same-name-different-range.csv
shows 583range
differences between same-named props.Please examine it for ontological errors. Here is a count by prop name. I've marked
<<<
differences that are errors, and???
that for me are questionable .