search

Sveino / Inst4CIM-KG

Instance of CIM Knowledge Graph
Apache License 2.0
5 stars 1 forks source link

should we add type `rdfg:Graph` ? #135

Open VladimirAlexiev opened 3 days ago

VladimirAlexiev commented 3 days ago

Should we add the rdfg:Graph class to emphasize that models are named graphs? E.g.

PREFIX rdfg: <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/>

<urn:uuid:1d8b61bc-c7f3-4e9e-a3bd-f4ec24beb586> {
  <urn:uuid:1d8b61bc-c7f3-4e9e-a3bd-f4ec24beb586>
        rdf:type                       md:FullModel, rdfg:Graph ; <<<<<<<<
        md:Model.DependentOn           <urn:uuid:2dd9014f-bdfb-11e5-94fa-c8f73332c8f4> ;
        md:Model.created               "2017-11-24T09:03:09.9446768Z" ;
        md:Model.description           "CGM Test model developed by Statnett SF. Nordic 44 bus system for the Nordic region" ;
        md:Model.modelingAuthoritySet  "http://www.Statnett.no/IGM/Nordic44_CGM" ;
        md:Model.profile               "http://entsoe.eu/CIM/SteadyStateHypothesis/1/1" , "http://entsoe.eu/CIM/SteadyStateHypothesis/1/2" ;
        md:Model.scenarioTime          "2015-03-06T01:30:00.0000000Z" ;
        md:Model.version               "36"  .

  <http://www.Statnett.no/IGM/Nordic44_CGM/_e2f56599-a78e-494f-8db3-c0b0bdab1d70>
        rdf:type                    cim:Terminal ;
        cim:ACDCTerminal.connected  "true" .
}

I think we should.

griddigit-ci commented 1 day ago

I think we need to discuss if we do this for transition purpose or as permanent solution. We want to get away from md: