Closed VladimirAlexiev closed 1 month ago
We are planning to move away from rdf:ID and only use rdf:about. However, I also think that we need to address the issue of xml:base. My thinking is that we can use the URL from modelingAuthoritySet for xml:base.
It will be good to know if the xml:base is CIM namespace or the MAS URI as Svein says. Do we want to convey that a given rdf node is from the cim namespace or it is something local - the MAS Vlado, it will be good to know your thinking here.
I think it make sense to think of xml:base as "who is speaking" so for power system model we should use MAS, but for the RDFS it should / could be the IEC standardisation speaking so this could be the CIM namespace.
@griddigit @Sveino what is MAS? Please give examples of the two cases you describe, then I can advise.
All XML files use node IDs like
rdf:ID="_f1769b90-9aeb-11e5-91da-b8763fd99c5f"
. These are fragment URLs relative to the file location. Because xml:base is not set, they end up as random URLs depending on where the file is placed, eg: