Closed Ethan-Earlie closed 2 years ago
Basically, I believe that this was a result of filtering. I'll let the authors point you to the filtering conditions that led to this reduction, but in the meantime I have placed the raw unfiltered counts on the Broad's Single Cell Portal: https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell/study/SCP1039/a-single-cell-and-spatially-resolved-atlas-of-human-breast-cancers#study-download
The file in question is brca_mini_atlas_raw_unfiltered.zip
I see, thank you for your quick reply!
Hi Ethan, our final dataset that we uploaded to the the Broad single-cell portal (~100k cells) was following the removal of all poor quality clusters after sub-clustering and detailed sub-annotation of our major cell types (Epithelial, CAFs, Endothelial, Perivascular, T-cells, Myeloid, B-cells). These filtered small clusters were predominantly driven by low genes, UMIs or high mitochondrial content, as well as those which showed features of doublets (expressing markers of other cell lineages).
Hello, I have a question about the number of cells present in the published analyses. In the Figure 1.A legend there are ~130k cells quoted for the UMAP. However, in the published data on the Broad Single Cell Portal there seem to be ~100k cells. Would you please be able to help clarify this discrepancy and how many cells were used to generate the main Fig.1.A UMAP.
Thank you!