These are presently reported for both junction and segment IES features.
However for junction features, which are zero-length, ta_pointer_start equals start coordinate if the IES is bounded by a TA repeat. This results in coordinate for ta_pointer_start being correct for python zero-based numbering system but not for GFF.
For junction features, ta_pointer_end equals ta_pointer_start, which doesn't make sense either.
Maybe just have a ta_offset attribute that states how many bases the start/end coordinates need to be adjusted. This would then be robust against any change in coordinate systems and also be suitable for both insertions and deletions.
These are presently reported for both junction and segment IES features.
However for junction features, which are zero-length,
ta_pointer_startequalsstartcoordinate if the IES is bounded by a TA repeat. This results in coordinate for ta_pointer_start being correct for python zero-based numbering system but not for GFF.For junction features,
ta_pointer_endequalsta_pointer_start, which doesn't make sense either.Maybe just have a
ta_offsetattribute that states how many bases the start/end coordinates need to be adjusted. This would then be robust against any change in coordinate systems and also be suitable for both insertions and deletions.