Here we discuss the linguistic annotation of various Swedish gold resources. The main purposes are to:
a) discover the imperfections and inconsistencies of the annotation both within and across resources;
b) minimize unnecessary discrepancies between resources, i.e. harmonize different resources as much as possible;
c) document the remaining discrepancies;
d) inform each other about the relevant work (evaluation, correction, conversion) we are doing (to avoid doing the same work twice and to join efforts when possible).
We may discuss any resources (Talbanken, SUC, SIC, Eukalyptus, LinES, PUD, Saldo, SynTag...) and formats (UD, SUC, Koala, Mamba...). Tools (Sparv, Efselab...) may also be discussed as long as the discussion is relevant to the annotation principles. Evaluation results are very useful to know.
By default, all discussions are visible to everyone.
There is no rule that we must communicate in English, but it may be convenient if in the future we want to use our discussion as a basis for documentation or if non-Scandinavists (e.g. from the UD community) have questions about Swedish annotation.
Here we discuss the linguistic annotation of various Swedish gold resources. The main purposes are to: a) discover the imperfections and inconsistencies of the annotation both within and across resources; b) minimize unnecessary discrepancies between resources, i.e. harmonize different resources as much as possible; c) document the remaining discrepancies; d) inform each other about the relevant work (evaluation, correction, conversion) we are doing (to avoid doing the same work twice and to join efforts when possible).
We may discuss any resources (Talbanken, SUC, SIC, Eukalyptus, LinES, PUD, Saldo, SynTag...) and formats (UD, SUC, Koala, Mamba...). Tools (Sparv, Efselab...) may also be discussed as long as the discussion is relevant to the annotation principles. Evaluation results are very useful to know.
By default, all discussions are visible to everyone.
There is no rule that we must communicate in English, but it may be convenient if in the future we want to use our discussion as a basis for documentation or if non-Scandinavists (e.g. from the UD community) have questions about Swedish annotation.