Closed S-S-X closed 4 years ago
in summary: base tool: cheap rec.
technic tool rec. includes base tool and crystal
Pros:
Cons:
Add recipe that is cheap enough that materials can be obtained without technic tools but expensive enough so it wont be first tool that can be made.
Using replacer should not give any XP to user.
I'd say good recipe could maybe use one default:gold_ingot, default:diamond, default:pick_mese and default:brick_block That requires basically finding 5 different materials: gold, diamond, mese, wood and clay.
Everything can be obtained from earth, is included in default minetest game and still requires some effort to get all of this.
maybe spade instead of pickaxe?
Even the basic replacer is more powerful than any pickaxe
Replacer is more powerful only because it does not require repairing. Suggestion: also add some tool wear to basic replacer.
edit. Maybe only for replacing but not for building blocks. XP loss should already be there.
I'd say good recipe could maybe use one default:gold_ingot, default:diamond, default:pick_mese and default:brick_block That requires basically finding 5 different materials: gold, diamond, mese, wood and clay.
Everything can be obtained from earth, is included in default minetest game and still requires some effort to get all of this.
Wood and clay can be gathered without tools, and gold, diamond, and mese can be obtained without a pickaxe through the admin store. The basic replacer can still be the first tool. We need to pick materials that are in MTG, can be found on earth, aren't too uncommon, and require tools to get.
currently I'm working on smth like this: {'default:chest', 'default:gold_ingot', ''}, {'', 'default:mese_crystal_fragment', ''}, {'', 'default:steel_ingot', 'default:chest'}, the admin-shop makes almost any ore available without the need for pickaxe. IMO it's allowed to be a cheap basic tool.
Seems fine, I guess
I'm open to suggestions. Felt SX's idea is good but just a bit on the expensive side. I understand why diamond should be in there, but as BobFred7 mentioned, can be had from admin-shop without digging. Maybe I'll feel different about it tomorrow again :)
Yea, I added default:brick_block just because of that, yes it can be obtained without tools and it is really cheap but you cant obtain it from spawn or from closest field / forest and also you need to do some smelting and crafting It requires you to do something: either find shop selling those or go swim and then smelt+craft stuff you obtained.
@thomasrudin there will be an issue where we need admins help. The current tool is replacer:replacer, after this, replacer:replacer will be the base tool for backward compat. and replacer:replacer_technic will be the upgraded tool. So a couple of replacers will downgrade and we need to provide upgraded ones for those players who crafted by the current technic-recipe.
So a couple of replacers will downgrade and we need to provide upgraded ones for those players who crafted by the current technic-recipe.
Sure thing, i'll prepare a full chest of them in the moderator area (accessible via travelnet owner: "admin", network: "moderator")
my branch upgradable is ready for beta-testers. I've included a recipe for directly crafting the technic version. Maybe we drop that. Also I'm open for discussion on the base-recipe and anything really ;)
Edit: Main changes:
technic mod is optional
Nice, now i can use the latest version on non-technic servers too :+1: (https://github.com/damocles-minetest/damocles-mods/pull/106)
I feel there should be a solution to not need multiple tools for the upgrade. Just a meta entry that marks a tool as upgraded. But I don't want to have to watch for every craft to do so.
merge candidate is now this branch It fixes #10 by doing as much as possible before aborting instead of just telling user that too many nodes have been detected.
If nobody finds any issues or wants recipe changes, this is ready to merge to master
If nobody finds any issues or wants recipe changes, this is ready to merge to master
LGTM (haven't tested it though)
I'll try to improve formatting later... edit. actually formatting is good enough :)