Sydney-Informatics-Hub / aigis

Tools for aerial and satellite imagery acquisition, processing, annotation, and analysis using artificial intelligence
MIT License
5 stars 1 forks source link

Add readme #1

Closed hlydecker closed 9 months ago

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./README.md 31.78 0.00 88
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.25 20.82 6393

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./README.md 31.78 0.00 88
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.25 20.82 6393

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.19 0.00 102
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.77 6407

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.19 0.00 102
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.77 6407

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.19 0.00 102
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.77 6407

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.25 0.00 96
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.30 20.79 6401

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.25 0.00 96
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.30 20.79 6401

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.78 6402

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.78 6402

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.78 6402

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.96 6424

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6529

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6529

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 4 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 35.53 0.00 98
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.37 20.85 6530

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

github-actions[bot] commented 4 months ago

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push :tada:

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 35.53 0.00 98
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.37 20.85 6530

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio. Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio. Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio. Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio. Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.