github-actions[bot]
commented
4 months ago Benchmark Results
| main | 31b02b5aa26b93... | main/31b02b5aa26b93... | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity/creation/Quantity(x) | 3.41 ± 0.011 ns | 2.79 ± 0 ns | 1.22 |
| Quantity/creation/Quantity(x, length=y) | 3.11 ± 0.01 ns | 3.41 ± 0.01 ns | 0.912 |
| Quantity/with_numbers/*real | 3.1 ± 0.01 ns | 3.1 ± 0.01 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_numbers/^int | 8.05 ± 2.2 ns | 8.04 ± 1.9 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_numbers/^int * real | 8.67 ± 2.2 ns | 8.36 ± 1.9 ns | 1.04 |
| Quantity/with_quantity/+y | 4.04 ± 0.001 ns | 4.04 ± 0.001 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_quantity//y | 3.42 ± 0.011 ns | 3.11 ± 0.001 ns | 1.1 |
| Quantity/with_self/dimension | 3.11 ± 0.01 ns | 3.1 ± 0.01 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_self/inv | 3.11 ± 0.001 ns | 3.11 ± 0.001 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_self/ustrip | 2.79 ± 0.01 ns | 2.79 ± 0.22 ns | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/multi_array_of_quantities | 0.145 ± 0.00073 ms | 0.146 ± 0.00086 ms | 0.997 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/multi_normal_array | 0.053 ± 0.0002 ms | 0.0528 ± 0.0041 ms | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/multi_quantity_array | 0.155 ± 0.00067 ms | 0.158 ± 0.00066 ms | 0.983 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^2_array_of_quantities | 22.7 ± 1.3 μs | 22.2 ± 1.3 μs | 1.02 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^2_normal_array | 4.28 ± 0.82 μs | 4.23 ± 0.93 μs | 1.01 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^2_quantity_array | 6.97 ± 0.22 μs | 6.85 ± 0.48 μs | 1.02 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^4_array_of_quantities | 0.0787 ± 0.00054 ms | 0.0786 ± 0.00048 ms | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^4_normal_array | 0.0467 ± 0.00024 ms | 0.0497 ± 0.00016 ms | 0.939 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^4_quantity_array | 0.0515 ± 0.0031 ms | 0.0499 ± 0.00016 ms | 1.03 |
| time_to_load | 0.129 ± 0.0032 s | 0.126 ± 0.003 s | 1.02 |
Benchmark Plots
A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR. Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).
Meshes.jl compatibility is currently broken due to a design issue recently introduced in that package, see: https://github.com/SymbolicML/DynamicQuantities.jl/issues/118. Once that package amend this issue we can turn this test back on, but I am averse to having ❌ show up on our tests if there isn't actually an issue on our side...