github-actions[bot]
commented
11 months ago Benchmark Results
| main | 3333cd9733748c... | t[main]/t[3333cd9733748c...] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity/creation/Quantity(x) | 3.4 ± 0 ns | 3.4 ± 0 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/creation/Quantity(x, length=y) | 3.7 ± 0 ns | 3.7 ± 0 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_numbers/*real | 3.4 ± 0 ns | 3.4 ± 0 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_numbers/^int | 11.5 ± 4.1 ns | 11.5 ± 4.1 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_numbers/^int * real | 11.8 ± 4 ns | 12 ± 4 ns | 0.983 |
| Quantity/with_quantity/+y | 6.8 ± 0.1 ns | 6.8 ± 0.1 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_quantity//y | 3.7 ± 0.001 ns | 3.7 ± 0.001 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_self/dimension | 1.7 ± 0 ns | 1.7 ± 0.001 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_self/inv | 3.4 ± 0 ns | 3.4 ± 0.001 ns | 1 |
| Quantity/with_self/ustrip | 1.7 ± 0 ns | 1.7 ± 0 ns | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/multi_array_of_quantities | 0.225 ± 0.007 ms | 0.226 ± 0.023 ms | 0.999 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/multi_normal_array | 0.0764 ± 0.0022 ms | 0.0761 ± 0.0021 ms | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/multi_quantity_array | 0.255 ± 0.0014 ms | 0.254 ± 0.0013 ms | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^2_array_of_quantities | 0.0426 ± 0.0045 ms | 0.0414 ± 0.0028 ms | 1.03 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^2_normal_array | 8.7 ± 1.5 μs | 9 ± 1.7 μs | 0.967 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^2_quantity_array | 10.2 ± 0.8 μs | 10.2 ± 1.4 μs | 1 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^4_array_of_quantities | 0.136 ± 0.0074 ms | 0.135 ± 0.0058 ms | 1.01 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^4_normal_array | 0.0688 ± 0.0014 ms | 0.069 ± 0.0013 ms | 0.997 |
| QuantityArray/broadcasting/x^4_quantity_array | 0.104 ± 0.0018 ms | 0.103 ± 0.0021 ms | 1.01 |
| time_to_load | 0.165 ± 0.0031 s | 0.165 ± 0.00031 s | 0.998 |
Benchmark Plots
A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR. Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).
MilesCranmer
cc @gaurav-arya
(For what it's worth, it seems like using
uconvert(us"km").(array)works, but it relies on compiler inlining a lot of stuff to be as efficient. Also,expand_unitshas a dedicated method, so I think it makes sense to do it here as well.)