Closed casperdcl closed 3 months ago
@KrisThielemans I prefer the last commit here, but up to you if you'd prefer to revert it
I think this table helps a lot! Thanks. Comments on the table:
only build & test (no tag) | CI (current commit)
is a bit confusing though. Maybe this should be built & tested during CI (no tag) | master
? (maybe it should be in bold?)core
but it's not in the table, which probably is confusing.I don't have a strong opinion on latest
vs jupyter
. I have no idea what conventions people generally use for docker tagging. We had sirf:latest
and it's a reasonable name, more so than sirf:jupyter
, so I'm fine with keeping latest
.
I note that we had sirf:latest
and sirf:service
. We no longer have the latter, and I think that's fine, as it was a bit confusing. I'm assuming (in fact, I know) that sirf:latest
now has the jupyter service running, so we could easily claim that these 2 have been merged into 1. (I do think that this needs to be stated explicitly in CHANGES.md
).
I'm still confused though by the last bit of the README, which talks about synerbi/jupyter:sirf
images made by copying stuff from sirf:latest
. Is that correct? Shouldn't they be in the table then? But they are not pushed?
synerbi/jupyter:*
andsynerbi/sirf:core*
are simply internal caches, so aren't in the table.
ok. Maybe a line with a clarification then for people like me ? :smile:
I'm fine with your other suggestions.
localhost
URL (fixes #889)-gpu
suffix:jupyter
tag (just use:latest
) 5168369 - maybe revert?