Closed ameyer66 closed 3 years ago
I did find however that using the tag:
<structure_name>.<field_name>
instead of the tag:
<structure_name>.<field_original_name_modified>
does make the field expand as desired.
Thanks for the additional information. I'm looking into it and will get back to you soon.
Fixed in release 5.7.6.
I apologize for the longwinded explanation but this is a bit of an edge case. If a repository structure has a group definition setup as an array that refers to another structure the actual record fields for the group don't get an array element suffix. Also if there are overlay fields in the middle of the group it causes the field order to be interspersed. The example here doesn't show that second effect. e.g.
This codegen code:
generates
the
porder.poline.
field prefix should actually read as:porder.poline[x].
before the final field name wherex
is the array value, in this case 1 through 1 3_ST_POLIN.TXT 3_ST_PORDER.TXT SqlIO.tpl.txt 0.