Open JHL-452b opened 2 months ago
the AI is right that ACOT2 (ENSG00000119673
) shouldn't be in the GPRs of MAR01716
and MAR01718
, since ACOT2 is localized to mitochondria and neither reaction happens in the mitochondrial compartment (source), but misses other errors in those GPRs:
ENSG00000205669
) is not known to be catalytically activeENSG00000177465
) is not localized to the cytosol, but MAR01716
happens in the cytosolic compartmentENSG00000184227
) and ACOT7 (ENSG00000097021
) are not peroxisomal proteins, but MAR01718
happens in the peroxisomal compartmentENSG00000101473
) is capable of catalyzing these reactions, is localized to peroxisomes, and is the only ACOT that I could find that's specifically described as capable of acting on bile acid intermediates (like chenodeoxycholoyl-CoA)so I think that the GPRs should be:
MAR01716
: ACOT1 or ACOT7 or BAAT (ENSG00000184227 or ENSG00000097021 or ENSG00000136881
)
MAR01718
: ACOT4 or ACOT8 or BAAT (ENSG00000177465 or ENSG00000101473 or ENSG00000136881
)
It may be better to remove ENSG00000138135
from the reaction MAR01786
, but we should add another one with a different product. For MAR01783
, we can keep ENSG00000203857
; for MAR01853, we should retain ENSG00000023839
and ENSG00000103222
, as their patterns are similar, with only slight differences in side chains. As for the other annotations, they seem fine. This issue primarily concerns the incorrect annotation of the amino acid transporter to the bile acid transport reactions.
Regarding MAR01786, I think CYP27A1(ENSG00000135929) is a suitable choice.
Current behavior:
31 genes are discovered to be uncorrelated with their corresponding reactions in
Bile acid biosynthesis
/Bile acid recycling