Open edkerk opened 6 years ago
Hi @edkerk are CLIB122-derived IDs due to a re-annotation and hence entirely different ORFs than W29-derived or would it be possible to use gene annotation to map between them?
@ChristianLieven see this supplementary table from the W29 genome paper for a mapping of CLIB122 to W29 ORFs, As you can see, some genes nicely map, while others are missing or new.
Thanks @edkerk I'll take a look!
Instead of using the CLIB122-derived YALI0 gene identifiers, used the W29-derived YALI1 genes instead. This most likely constitutes a whole new reconstruction, to be tracked in a separate branch.
edit: instead of separate branch, @ChristianLieven has included Yali1 identifiers in the same model here.