Closed hongzhonglu closed 6 years ago
@hongzhonglu To clarify, with "nonORF based on ref genome" are meant those panIDs that were not originally derived from S288c, but the genes with this panID have high sequence similarity to the refered S288c gene and therefore likely orthologs? In that case, these should then be annotated in the pan-genome model as OR relationship together with the panID 'directly' coupled to that S288c gene?
Example:
YML056C exists as panID 5975-YML056C
but also annotated as ortholog for panID 1729-snap_masked-BBH_6-7041
. Any grRule with YML056C in yeast-GEM should then be replaced with 5975-YML056C OR 1729-snap_masked-BBH_6-7041
. Correct?
@edkerk You are right! 'Or' relation should be used if one panID(nonORF) and another panID(ORF from s288c genome) are belong to the 'ortholog' relation.
Main improvements in this PR:
Add the mapping relation between the panID and geneID from s288c genome. Based on this mapping relation, the initial panModel could be established. I hereby confirm that I have:
devel
as a target branch (top left drop-down menu)Note: replace [ ] with [X] to check the box. PLEASE DELETE THIS LINE