Open acaravind opened 2 months ago
hi, any update? i just want a confirmation that this is a real issue and i am not mistaken !
This is expected, if you had a look at the open issues you would see that it is discussed in #10
Thank you for the response. Somehow couldn't find it when i did the search! Glad to know that it is being addressed.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 4:06 PM Roo @.***> wrote:
This is expected, if you had a look at the open issues you would see that it is discussed in #10 https://github.com/SystemRDL/PeakRDL-cheader/pull/10
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SystemRDL/PeakRDL-cheader/issues/17#issuecomment-2350946263, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPN3OYB6UUNYVR7IGITDXLZWQGRLAVCNFSM6AAAAABODY22VOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNJQHE2DMMRWGM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
No worries, I have been keeping an eye on it myself.
On Sat, 14 Sept 2024, 23:57 acaravind, @.***> wrote:
Thank you for the response. Somehow couldn't find it when i did the search! Glad to know that it is being addressed.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 4:06 PM Roo @.***> wrote:
This is expected, if you had a look at the open issues you would see that it is discussed in #10 https://github.com/SystemRDL/PeakRDL-cheader/pull/10
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/SystemRDL/PeakRDL-cheader/issues/17#issuecomment-2350946263>,
or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPN3OYB6UUNYVR7IGITDXLZWQGRLAVCNFSM6AAAAABODY22VOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNJQHE2DMMRWGM>
. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SystemRDL/PeakRDL-cheader/issues/17#issuecomment-2351000928, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJASSGUGKGJYWI3UXI3PNI3ZWQ6DXAVCNFSM6AAAAABODY22VOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNJRGAYDAOJSHA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
If the rdl contains : field { enum xyz{ XXX= 3'b000 { desc = "XXXXX"; }; YYY= 3'b001 { desc = "YYYY"; }; encode = xyz; } bits[3];
: I was expecting the generated C header to contain the enumerated data type elaborated in the usual lexical/hierarchical namespace..
This seems to be an omission, in what is otherwise a fantastic, high quality tool!