Closed KendallWeihe closed 3 weeks ago
Originally proposed here.
But @frankhinek's comment here proposed a slightly different approach. There was sufficient differentiation to warrant opening a new Pull Request as to compare and contrast the different approaches.
I propose we close #30 and merge this PR instead.
This isn't quite right because the point of initiation is SIOPv2, not OID4VCI. Closing this PR in favor of #30.
Originally proposed here.
But @frankhinek's comment here proposed a slightly different approach. There was sufficient differentiation to warrant opening a new Pull Request as to compare and contrast the different approaches.
I propose we close #30 and merge this PR instead.