Closed michaelneale closed 5 months ago
cc @ethan-tbd for review - this doesn't have STORED_BALANCE -> STORED_BALANCE yet as not sure how the "to" did is passed in (from looking at didpay code).
cc @ethan-tbd for review - this doesn't have STORED_BALANCE -> STORED_BALANCE yet as not sure how the "to" did is passed in (from looking at didpay code).
yea this looks great! we still need to work out the fine details of a STORED_BALANCE
to STORED_BALANCE
send offering. i imagine we could use the to
field in the Rfq
(instead of putting the pfi's did) and have the recipient did map to one of their pfi dids? not sure yet..
@ethan-tbd I think the to
tells the client what PFI to talk to, so can't really be used for send (if its the field I am thinking of anyway).
@ethan-tbd I think the
to
tells the client what PFI to talk to, so can't really be used for send (if its the field I am thinking of anyway).
actually seems like we would have the to
be your pfi's did and the recipient's payment address would be passed in via requiredPaymentDetails
(since the pfi sends on your behalf as they custody your funds)
@ethan-tbd yes, that is what I was meaning, yeah.
adding stored balances support