When issuing a role persist, mute, or ban, Wheatley responds with, e.g., <user name> was role-persisted. However, this response does not elaborate on the details of the action such as what role was applied, for what reason, or for how long. While these parameters can be seen by clicking on the specific command that was issued, this lack of visibility has resulted in confusion on part of both moderators and bystanders in the past ("did they really just permanoofftopic them for this").
We should improve Wheatley's responses to moderation commands to mention all these details, e.g., <user name> was given the No Off Topic role for 2 days, reason: <reason>.
jeremy-rifkin
commented
10 months ago
When issuing a role persist, mute, or ban, Wheatley responds with, e.g.,
<user name> was role-persisted. However, this response does not elaborate on the details of the action such as what role was applied, for what reason, or for how long. While these parameters can be seen by clicking on the specific command that was issued, this lack of visibility has resulted in confusion on part of both moderators and bystanders in the past ("did they really just permanoofftopic them for this").We should improve Wheatley's responses to moderation commands to mention all these details, e.g.,
<user name> was given the No Off Topic role for 2 days, reason: <reason>.