Crossover Reviw Ticket - Arnav

[ArnavNadar]

Individual Review "Arnav" grading "Anusha"

Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks Per check. 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Freeform comment. Provide positivies and growth summary. Justify or comment on final score. Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.

https://tdwolff.github.io/NAVTFrontend/basics/colorcode

Link to video: https://youtu.be/WHJqMRG6I0g?si=oBH9KQ0tTXXfn9Ew

[Flying-Book]

Individual Review Anusha grading Arnav

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [ ] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

• Key contributor Score: 0.97
  • Good work division
  • Topic given was Bianry Colors + well thought of user interaction
  • Talked about team collaboration
  • Great attitude during presentation
  • Showed idea making process
  • Talked about future additions
• Video in CPT caption style Score: 0.55
  • Not added in the Exit Ticket by the time I reviewed it.
• Issues Score: 0.68
  • No Individual Issues in Git Hub Issues. Individual Review Ticket was incomplete but code contributions were explained inperson.
• Key Commits: 0.78
  • Commits are present when checking Team Review but not individually linked. Present when checking contrbution history. Maybe next time could incoporate within the Exit Ticket.
• Git Hub Analytics Score: 0.87
  • Low number of commits but commits have a lot of code in each commit. Evenly distibuted commits (end of each weekish)

---

FreeForm Comment:

• Note that Exit Ticket and Video Link was not complete at grading time but Arnav explained to me some of the key features.
• Video Link and Exit Ticket was added later.
• I like the work on the Binary Color Vizaulier
  • lots of vizaulization based on user input
  • clear Binary link (RBG, darkness scale based on binary)
  • Good potential usage