NAVT Team Review

[Th35py27]

Name	Team + Indi + Teacher	Key Commits	GitHub	Analytics
/1	NAVT Frontend		https://github.com/TDWolff/NAVTFrontend	(https://github.com/TDWolff/NAVTFrontend/graphs/contributors)

Name	Team+Indi+Teacher	Key Commits	Analytics	Video	Individual Ticket
Nandan V	[0.84] (https://github.com/TDWolff/NAVTFrontend/issues/11#issuecomment-1854597561)	Included everything that converts binary to dec and dec to binary in order to help people learn this info	profile	Video	Link
Arnav N	0.77/9	Added a nice color code aspect to binary. It is a color RGB selector that helps mix colors together using the RGB colors Red, Green, and Blue	profile	Video	Link
Varun M	0.9	logic 2nd quiz 1st quiz Truth table	profile project analytics	Video	Link
Torin W	(0.9+0.9+0.85+0.9+0.9)/5=0.89/9 Team Score: 0.9, Teacher Score: 0.89/9 Final Score: 1.81/2	Merge sortbubble sortinsertion sortselection sortCreated popup for sort animationNav bar styling and gallery styling. Commits	Profile	Pixel sorting demo	Individual Review

[iKAN2025]

Individual Review "Isabel Grading Nandan"

Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

Video, includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks Per check. 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

final score: 0.89

Freeform comment. Showed adequate key commit, plans/progress. Had key commits/good analytics for each commit. The program is working and functional(no errors). Could have added more graphics/styling (showing the actual process of conversion using 2^x for above and beyond! Good job

[vibha-yganji]

Individual Review "Vibha" grading "Varun"

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

Varun's Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] (0.9) Video in CPT caption style, includes Web demo of key contribution to project: Varun's video showed key commits and appropriately explained the project to me. Captions were also easy to follow along with.
• [x] (0.9) Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives attempted, incomplete, but some runtime: issues containing team progress along the duration of the project were made + showed helpful suggestions for the future.
• [x] (0.8) Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions mastery and runtime: key commits were high in number and were important to the project. When he explained the project to me, it was clear what he had done that and how his contributions were important to the project.
• [x] (0.9) Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project: commits were very high and well-spaced out across the duration of the project, he went above and beyond in contributing to the project.

Overall: 0.9

Very high-level number of commits that were regularly done + extensive knowledge of the project. The video was very detailed and clearly showed his contributions to the project. When explaining his project, he clearly gave me a walkthrough and sure I understood what he had contributed. However, he should create issues throughout the course of the project to keep track of overall team progress.