Open jeff-cohere opened 2 years ago
Hey @bishtgautam , can you show me how to reproduce this issue? I'm wondering if it still occurs, and/or how much we should focus on fixing the WY tests when we know that discretization is going to be reworked.
I thought we had discussed just removing it as needed? We can always reconstruct it later if it is needed.
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 2:40 PM Jeffrey N. Johnson @.***> wrote:
Hey @bishtgautam https://github.com/bishtgautam , can you show me how to reproduce this issue? I'm wondering if it still occurs, and/or how much we should focus on fixing the WY tests when we know that discretization is going to be reworked.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/TDycores-Project/TDycore/issues/224#issuecomment-1118926253, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKFCB5BMUWTVVSCXUO75XLVIQI2XANCNFSM5NSGZFXA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Yeah, maybe we should just "comment out" these regression tests for now. Thanks, @nocollier .
Some recent updates have cause failures in the WY demos. @bishtgautam submitted PR #221, which applies several fixes to restore the dycore's parallel capabilities. Then PR #220 was merged, adding an interface for diagnostic fields. In a separate branch that contains the changes for #221 rebased to
master
post #220, the WY demos stopped working. Gautam's assessment:We're tracking that issue here so we can go ahead and merge #221.
We should probably add more parallel tests to our regression suite to make sure we don't damage the parallel runs in our future work.