TE-Academy / Reputation-based_Weighted_Voting

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Scope Phase 2 (until OP Round 6 opens) #35

Closed AngelaKTE closed 2 hours ago

AngelaKTE commented 3 weeks ago

Description

Check and confirm scope so that we maximize likeliness to receive an OP grant in OP Retro Funding round 6, and maximise our efficiency in working on this

Notes

The key step is to get a clear list of the scenario/story we are looking at, and what properties/requirements need to be met in that story.
Agree.

I'd add this to the requirements:
"When a user receives a new NFT, and new weights are calculated, each voter has at least as much absolute weight as they did before the new calculations. Minting new NFTs does never decrease the absolute weight of any user."

If we find that it's in conflict with the fundamental properties, we can go back to our current solution.

Plus I agree, let's review all other issues, too.
Open issues from my point of view:

For the requirements:

We can add 1-2 more design goals that you consider relevant and feasible.
Plus let's see how to integrate the indicator function here.

I feel it would be good to keep both separate.
Meaning: we create two separate stories, mechanisms, simulator demo notebooks, and let ppl know that both (Dynmic Network-Weight Scaling & Indicator Functions) can be combined, see our particular use case.

@eightarmsninebrains WDYT?

linear[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

TE-55 Scope Phase 2 (until OP Round 6 opens)

eightarmsninebrains commented 1 day ago

I propose this issue be closed.

(In the future, can we use GitHub Discussions or another place for larger discussions like this?)