Open HugoSchtr opened 2 years ago
I would put <graphic>
in <sourceDoc>
, because in some cases you would need to use @source
. The original image, may it be referenced in <graphic>
or @source
, would therefore be in the same element <sourceDoc>
rather than sometimes in <sourceDoc>
, sometimes in <facsimile>
. No? Cf.
<surfaceGrp xml:id="Epithalame1687_0004" type="page">
<surface xml:id="Epithalame1687_0004_BT5_1"
source="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/bpt6k57078011/f0004/330,1369,198,187/full/0/native"
corresp="#BT5" ana="#decoNote"/>
<zone xml:id="Epithalame1687_0004_BT2_2_LT1_1" corresp="#LT1"
points="404 953 404 897 427 878 …"
source="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/bpt6k57078011/f0004/402,878,1321,150/full/0/native">
<path xml:id="Epithalame1687_0004_BT2_2_LT1_1_1" points="406 973 1725 978"/>
<line>du texte</line>
</zone>
</surfaceGrp>
Image metadata is currently tagged within the
<sourceDoc>
element with<graphic>
.Instead, and for the sake of clarity, image metadata can be tagged inside the
<facsimile>
element:Image metadata and transcription data would then be separated in their respective elements. With appropriate
xml:id
andfacs
attributes, multiple images could be encoded with a single TEI file.