Open trishaoconnor opened 1 year ago
This issue is address by #633. (Which was written to address #627, but since it required typing only ~30 extra characters to address this issue at the same time …) If & when that PR is merged into dev, I suspect this issue can just be closed.
PR #633 adds handling for the (currently non-existent) tei:interleave
element. However, we should wait until said element is created (per TEIC/TEI#2154) and we can actually test that it works before closing
In order to implement TEIC/TEI#2154, we need proper processing in place for
<tei:interleave>
(which likely produces<rng:interleave>
). The processing for<tei:interleave>
will replace of the current process for<tei:sequence preserveOrder="false">
.