Closed martindholmes closed 9 years ago
Even worse: it's actually "organisation" with an "s".
Hmm. Suspicions on fall on either an American (hypercorrecting the Anglo-American 'organization' to a putative British '*organisation') -- or someone French using French spelling.
Nasty one. You're probably right, i just dont like the idea of perpetuating a short non-word like "org". Will change this.
On 4 June 2015 at 21:59, Martin Holmes notifications@github.com wrote:
For a long time, we have had the notion that e.g.
is syntactic sugar for and we even have an example of @type https://github.com/type="org" in the Guidelines: http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-name.html
Why does Simple adopt the unconventional
? — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/17.
Sebastian Rahtz
Director (Research) of Academic IT
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Não sou nada.
Nunca serei nada.
Não posso querer ser nada.
À parte isso, tenho em mim todos os sonhos do mundo.
For a long time, we have had the notion that e.g.
<orgName>
is syntactic sugar for<name type="org">
and we even have an example of @type="org" in the Guidelines:http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-name.html
Why does Simple adopt the unconventional
<name type="organization">
?<name type="placeGeog">
is even weirder, alongside<name type="place">
. Aren't all geographical names places? Why not<name type="geog">
?