Closed buckett closed 9 years ago
thats a good question! not 1.0, so probably 2.0. We need to change the spec to say so. Does it present a problem?
In Java requiring XPath 2 means that Saxon-HE looks to be the only realistic implementation.
Yes, thats a not a surprise. It's used so widely already that I dont see it as a problem. Pity, but XPath 2.0 is just too well-known.
On 24 March 2015 at 16:03, Matthew Buckett notifications@github.com wrote:
In Java requiring XPath 2 means that Saxon-HE looks to be the only realistic implementation.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/TEIC/TEI-Simple/issues/4#issuecomment-85578331.
Sebastian Rahtz
Director (Research) of Academic IT
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Não sou nada.
Nunca serei nada.
Não posso querer ser nada.
À parte isso, tenho em mim todos os sonhos do mundo.
Currently the specification refers to XPath expressions but doesn't elaborate as to which version of XPath should be used.