Closed CarmendeSantiago closed 1 year ago
Even though my Spanish is way too weak to contribute meaningfully, I think @rettinghaus is correct — these should probably be descriptions, not glosses. Except that @type
of <abbr>
already has a gloss in Spanish (“tipo”), and it already has a description in Spanish, that looks suspiciously like the glosses provided on this PR. Has someone already fixed this and not closed the PR?
There was confusion between <desc>
and <gloss>
and the translation could be improved a bit (like trying to not use the so called “generic masculine”. Thus, we decided to just close this PR.
I think all these
gloss
should bedesc
.