I propose that <app> should be allowed to be the sole content of a <sp> element. At the moment this is invalid:
<sp who="#CHOLMLEY">
<app type="textual">
<lem wit="#MS1">
<l>Not so, my lord, it does no good.</l>
</lem>
<rdg wit="#MS2">
<p>I did not think so.</p>
</rdg>
</app>
</sp>
The reason seems to be that an <app> can't be the sole content of an <sp>, since adding a single empty <l> element fixes the above, and the following is valid:
<sp who="#CHOLMLEY">
<l></l>
<app type="textual">
<lem wit="#MS1">
<l>Not so, my lord, it does no good.</l>
</lem>
<rdg wit="#MS2">
<p>I did not think so.</p>
</rdg>
</app>
</sp>
Surely that makes no sense and there is no good reason why an <app> can't be the sole content of an <sp> element. If we
agree on that, I'd like to propose that the TEI standard is altered to fix this too.
This makes sense to me but we'll need to find a way to make sure the <app> contains the content model usually required by <sp>. Will discuss with the council.
I propose that
<app>
should be allowed to be the sole content of a<sp>
element. At the moment this is invalid:The reason seems to be that an
<app>
can't be the sole content of an<sp>
, since adding a single empty<l>
element fixes the above, and the following is valid:Surely that makes no sense and there is no good reason why an
<app>
can't be the sole content of an<sp>
element. If we agree on that, I'd like to propose that the TEI standard is altered to fix this too.