Closed pvthinker closed 1 year ago
I was about to comment the https://github.com/TEOS-10/GSW-Python/pull/130 but you closed it before I could.
Sorry about that but a new issue to is better to track this.
do you think it's worth I submit a PR to add gibbs to the package ?
If you can see a path forward please do. I'm stuck with the day job today and won't be able to work on this until next week.
So far we have two choices:
@efiring did I capture your comments correctly above?
PS: We can probably close #128 b/c this issue covers it and more.
Yes,you capture my comment well. I'm about to submit the PR For the implementation, I'm following a third option, more like 1) than 2) but way shorter than 1).
Hello,
I was about to comment the #130 but you closed it before I could. I'm reopening an issue on the topic:
do you think it's worth I submit a PR to add gibbs to the package ?
My motivation. This morning my solution to include 'gibbs' was a bit ugly. I've cleaned it. It is now very simple and it works well for gibbs. I can see that it could quite easily be generalized to the other missing functions.