Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I would much, much, much rather see the schema-specific prefix resolver go
away. And I find myself violently antipathetic to a proposal that takes
abstractions from one allegedly-miscellaneous (but in my opinion, name- and
namespace-related) package and uses them to turn two other packages into
miscellanies related only by call graph.
I'm tempted to mark this as a duplicate of 39, but these issues are not
specifically called out in that issue.
Original comment by aale...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2011 at 9:05
actually, removed org.genxdm.xs.resolve.PrefixResolver. Left the one in
org.genxdm.names. Makes more sense, since prefix resolution certainly isn't
schema-specific (even if the only implementations are in the schema parser and
validator).
Original comment by aale...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 7:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
joe.bays...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2011 at 8:50