solely NM | forest managed area seems off

TNC-NMFO / NWLAND

carbon accounting model

0 stars 0 forks source link

solely NM | forest managed area seems off #149

Open sbassett opened 2 years ago

sbassett commented 2 years ago

Scenario file is likely haywire...

[ ] Weird zig zag in potential
[ ] Potential area exceeds maximum area
[ ] Stair-stepped BAU

file:///C:/Users/Steve/Downloads/NWLAND_nm_20220330/outputs/output_nm/figs_85_nm/All_region/Forest/All_own/All_region_Forest_All_own_Managed_area_output.pdf

aj1s commented 2 years ago

Per #148: Historical areas in nm_scenarios_nm_ac.xls don't match what I have in the summarized/extrapolated FACTS data. Thinking to temporarily commit an alternative NM scenarios file containing what I think are the correct historical values (for management in Forest and Woodland).

sbassett commented 2 years ago

That sounds like a good plan.

Reverted deletion of Thinning_current because we need that practice to decrease from now until 2030 (while Thinning_potential and Thinning_maximum phase in). https://github.com/TNC-NMFO/NWLAND/commit/b70e4b39cb42509c0eec3b5418ed1f1fad25bf6a

sbassett commented 2 years ago

A template like this would help with the calculations. It's probably more trouble than it's worth right now, but long-term would make the projections easier. USCA_NM_ThinningWorksheet.xlsx

aj1s commented 2 years ago

I need to correct Partial_cut areas in the FACTS tab 4876c4602b025cb12a20054cae4c2853ee3e0e70. Within 5 minutes, I will either amend the commit, or add another commit if you've changed the scenarios_nm_ac.xls again in the meantime.

I've corrected the above Partial_cut areas in the introduced tab with df49f8fe1d15a935f69f5fab1c78c9364ddec03f.
scenario_nm_ac.xls is ready for you to review (if you've been waiting to do so).

sbassett commented 2 years ago

Potential scenario has Prescribed_burn through the roof!