solely NM | run synopsis for diagnostics

[sbassett]

neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 3 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 3 are  
neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 4 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 4 are  
neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 5 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 5 are  
neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 6 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 6 are  
neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 7 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 7 are  
neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 8 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 8 are  
neginds for out_density_df_list lcc 9 are  
total areas for neginds out_density_df_list lcc 9 are  
lcc carbon change is  -214097.1 
lcc net carbon transfer to other land types is  -213542.4 
lcc carbon to wood is  0 
lcc carbon to atmos decayed is  -554.7185 
lcc carbon to atmos burned is  0 
lcc carbon to energy is  0 
lcc negative carbon cleared is  0 
sum of eco negative carbon cleared is -109752027 
Starting change/total calcs...
Starting writing output at Sat Apr 02 23:47:38 2022 
Finished writing output at Sat Apr 02 23:48:10 2022 
Finished CALAND at Sat Apr 02 23:48:11 2022 

[sbassett]

lcc carbon to atmos burned = 0 is fishy I'm not sure what this metric means, but I'd expect carbon to atmosphere from fire to be non-zero for every simulation year, and certainly over the full simulation period. Hopefully this is just the landover-change model, with solely development-driven landcover change