Closed nikowitt closed 7 years ago
Hi @nikowitt,
glad to hear from you and you are still using our junit-dataprovider :-)
No, there is no reason for that besides that I did not think about that case at all. Thanks for that. Am I rude to ask for PR? :-P
Cheers, Andreas
Interesting, it seems that with 1.12.0 it already works - with 1.11.0 I had to implement this.
Hm ... I refactored the logic. But good if it works already :-) At least it is worth to write a unit test for your case, though.
Hi there,
is there any specific reason why DataConverter.canConvert, line 31 is implemented as
instead of
? This way, lots of type conversions in a dataprovider can be avoided.
Best regards, Niko