github-actions[bot]
commented
2 weeks ago Sigrid maintainability feedback
✅ You wrote maintainable code and achieved your Sigrid objective of 3.5 stars
Sigrid compared your code against the baseline of 2024-10-18.
👍 What went well?
You fixed or improved 0 refactoring candidates.
👎 What could be better?
Unfortunately, 1 refactoring candidates were introduced or got worse.
| Risk | System property | Location |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 | Duplication (Introduced) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/method.rs (lines 148-154) WuppieFuzz/src/input/method.rs (lines 159-165) |
📚 Remaining technical debt
0 refactoring candidates didn't get better or worse, but are still present in the code you touched.
Sigrid ratings
| System property | System on 2024-10-18 | Before changes | New/changed code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | 5.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Duplication | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.6 |
| Unit Size | 2.1 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Unit Complexity | 2.9 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Unit Interfacing | 2.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Module Coupling | 3.3 | N/A | N/A |
| Component Independence | 5.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Component Entanglement | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Maintainability | 3.6 | 4.9 | 5.0 |
Did you find this feedback helpful?
We would like to know your thoughts to make Sigrid better. Your username will remain confidential throughout the process.
ThomasTNO
ringogroenewegen
Two HTTP methods were missing: Options and Connect. These are now added to prevent the fuzzer from crashing when encountering these in an OpenAPI spec