github-actions[bot]
commented
3 weeks ago Sigrid maintainability feedback
✅ You wrote maintainable code and achieved your Sigrid objective of 3.5 stars
Sigrid compared your code against the baseline of 2024-10-30.
👍 What went well?
You fixed or improved 0 refactoring candidates.
👎 What could be better?
Unfortunately, 1 refactoring candidates were introduced or got worse.
| Risk | System property | Location |
|---|---|---|
| 🟠 | Module Coupling (Worsened) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs |
📚 Remaining technical debt
6 refactoring candidates didn't get better or worse, but are still present in the code you touched.
| Risk | System property | Location |
|---|---|---|
| 🟠 | Unit Size (Unchanged) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs fix_broken_references(R) |
| 🟡 | Unit Size (Unchanged) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs Body.build(OpenAPI,Operation,Option) |
| 🟡 | Unit Size (Unchanged) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs Input.generate_name(Option) |
| 🟡 | Unit Size (Unchanged) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs fix_input_parameters(S,usize,OpenApiRequest) |
| 🟡 | Unit Interfacing (Unchanged) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs Body.build(OpenAPI,Operation,Option) |
| 🟡 | Unit Interfacing (Unchanged) |
WuppieFuzz/src/input/mod.rs fix_input_parameters(S,usize,OpenApiRequest) |
Sigrid ratings
| System property | System on 2024-10-30 | Before changes | New/changed code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | 5.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Duplication | 3.9 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Unit Size | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Unit Complexity | 2.9 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Unit Interfacing | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Module Coupling | 3.3 | N/A | N/A |
| Component Independence | 5.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Component Entanglement | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Maintainability | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Did you find this feedback helpful?
We would like to know your thoughts to make Sigrid better. Your username will remain confidential throughout the process.
ThomasTNO
grebnetiew
Addresses #38 (hopefully)