Hello, I modified the conf indicator according to what you said, and the final acc, comp, and all indicators are very close to your paper, but the qualitative analysis results are still very different from those in your paper, no matter how small the settings are, there is still a big difference between them and your paper, I haven't changed your code, I don't know what the reason is, can you help solve it, the GPU I use is A5000, or the evaluation of the DTU dataset needs to run test_pcd_dtu.sh instead of test_dtu.sh when I set the conf indicator to 0.1, the effect is as follows.
Hello, I modified the conf indicator according to what you said, and the final acc, comp, and all indicators are very close to your paper, but the qualitative analysis results are still very different from those in your paper, no matter how small the settings are, there is still a big difference between them and your paper, I haven't changed your code, I don't know what the reason is, can you help solve it, the GPU I use is A5000, or the evaluation of the DTU dataset needs to run test_pcd_dtu.sh instead of test_dtu.sh when I set the conf indicator to 0.1, the effect is as follows.
![c29621da5554aa77790cfecfba40707a](https://github.com/TQTQliu/ET-MVSNet/assets/149451618/1176d2c1-1728-4b18-8774-c36104b8cc90)