Closed julianrojas87 closed 2 years ago
Good point. I didn’t investigate it yet, but if we want to be compatible with Shape Trees (st:validatedBy
), then yes, we need to support shex. tree:path
however will always remain a SHACL property path.
@woutslabbinck added an example in here!
We’re going to change the tree:shape to also support ShEx, so you can choose which one you use.
I added a small note in the part on the shape: saying the for compatibility with Solid, you could also support ShEx.
Wondering if a TREE client should also be able to interpret ShEx as a way to describe members data shape, via the
tree:shape
property of a collection. If so, it should also be mentioned.