Open pietercolpaert opened 2 years ago
So I understand this property is to avoid redundant triples when dealing with compatible collections and facilitating clients to quickly know where to look for members.
I guess this would be an optional property, that whenever not present, default behavior should be to first look for tree:member
and any other property that could indicate membership (hydra:member
, skos:inScheme
, etc)
Yes indeed. I think this would be interesting to make sure TREE clients can also work on top of existing APIs
If we don’t want to repeat tree:member if another property is used to indicate the containment
E.g.,:
Proposal
tree:membershipPath
withrdfs:range
a shacl path and withrdfs:domain
atree:Node