Closed shenggong1996 closed 3 years ago
I don't know why the test failed on Windows. Seems to be related to commit 853da0e
@HakyungKwon-TRI @danielschweigert-TRI
@txie-93 I pushed a constraint on sklearn version (that seemed to be the error causing fatal exception) It's now running into errors with the feature size vectors. Not sure why this is not an issue with the macos/ubuntu builds, but I am looking into it. Can you check if the errors that it's complaining about (you can see it under Actions > find the latest failed run > click through until you see Annotations > pytest) are real?
@HakyungKwon-TRI This looks odd. I am asking Sheng to see what he thinks.
@HakyungKwon-TRI How is mordred
installed? I had a quick chat with Sheng, and we suspect the version of mordred
on linux and windows could be different. As a result, the number of features may also be different
@txie-93 they're both on 1.2.0 version, from conda-forge. Installed via conda using the env.yml.
Windows: https://github.com/TRI-AMDD/htp_md/runs/3538718102?check_suite_focus=true MacOS/Linux: https://github.com/TRI-AMDD/htp_md/runs/3538718124?check_suite_focus=true
I did some checks. The number of features on linux is 1611. But https://github.com/TRI-AMDD/htp_md/runs/3538718102?check_suite_focus=true says the number of features on Windows is 1265. So I think this is probably the issue. But I don't have a windows computer to reproduce.
@HakyungKwon-TRI Where did you see the mordred
version on Windows is 1.2.0 on windows? It seems that I cannot find it. It is odd that the number of features are different if the version is the same.
@txie-93 If you go to the active run (https://github.com/TRI-AMDD/htp_md/runs/3540539025?check_suite_focus=true), it's under Run Conda Install mkl=2018. Scroll, and you should see a list of all packages that were installed as part of conda install.
I'll try to see if there are other ways to debug (I also only have access to macos). We can consider logging this and moving on for now, since macos/linux tests pass.
I agree that we could merge this but leave an issue on the repo for the future. @shenggong1996 is on vacation now and we can ask him to explore more once he is back. Can you merge this pull request? @HakyungKwon-TRI
Random forest models to predict polymer transport property